4.7 Article

Policy effectiveness on emissions and cost reduction for hydrogen supply chains: The case for British Columbia

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 998-1011

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.190

关键词

Low-carbon hydrogen; Supply chain optimization; Policy effectiveness; Production tax credit; Low carbon fuel standard; Carbon tax

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research council of Canada through a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  2. Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that production tax credits and electricity incentives are up to 24 times more effective in promoting low-carbon hydrogen production compared to capital subsidies, bans on steam methane reforming, or higher carbon taxes. Strategic deployment of policies over time was more effective than cumulative subsidies.
Hydrogen-specific policies are required to accelerate the adoption of low-carbon hydrogen. In this study, a range of economic instruments and regulations were incorporated explicitly to optimize a hydrogen supply chain. The effectivenes of policies aiming to enhance the financial viability of low-carbon hydrogen production was quantified. A spatially explicit, multi-period cost optimization model was developed for light duty hydrogen hydrogen vehicle deployment in British Columbia under three demand scenarios. Subsidies and regulations were coupled to current provincial policies (a carbon tax and a low carbon fuel standard). The results indicated that production tax credits and electricity incentives were up to 24 times more effective in facilitating low-carbon hydrogen production compared to capital subsidies, bans on steam methane reforming or the adoption of higher carbon taxes. The strategic deployment of policies over time was found to be more effective than cumulative subsidies. Crown Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据