4.7 Article

Using Thermodynamic Availability to Predict the Transitional Film Reynolds Number between the Droplet and Jet Modes in Falling Liquid between Horizontal Tubes

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120557

关键词

Thermodynamics; Availability; Falling film; Mode transition; Droplet mode; Jet mode; Reynolds number

资金

  1. Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Center (ACRC) at the University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Solar Energy Technology Office [DE-EE00 08392]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes and validates a model for predicting the transitional film Reynolds number between droplet and jet modes, which relies on thermodynamic availability and achieves higher accuracy and shorter computation time compared to existing models.
The objective of this paper is to propose and validate a model for predicting the transitional film Reynolds number between the droplet and jet modes of falling film flows. The proposed model relies on thermodynamic availability with no fitting to mode transition data. The model directly predicts the numerical values of the transitional film Reynolds numbers at different operating conditions. The results of the model are validated against 43 experimental data points from the literature, which cover 10 working fluids and a wide range of tube geometries. The accuracy of the proposed model in predicting the validation data is -on average- more than 20% better than that of the widely used Re = a (Ga)(b) and Re = a (Ga)(b) (S/xi)(c) models. The model also achieves low computation time (less than 30 seconds for the 43 validation data points). The model presented in this paper has the potential of integration with heat transfer, mass transfer, and pressure drop models for optimizing the design and operation of falling film heat and mass exchangers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据