4.7 Article

Newton's Law of Cooling: Follow up and exploration

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120544

关键词

Newton's Law of Cooling; Convective heat transfer; Temperature measurement; Lumped heat capacitance model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper investigates Isaac Newton's Latin paper on thermal science, particularly focusing on Newton's Law of Cooling and temperature measurements. Experimental results were conducted to reproduce the original findings, especially in high-temperature regions, and the study also addressed the impact of natural convection on cooling processes. The reason behind Newton's publication of an anonymous paper on temperature measurement above the boiling point of water was also explored.
Isaac Newton's paper, in Latin, on thermal science, Scala graduum Caloris, (Scale of the Degree of Heat), published in the Philosophical Transactions (1701) is investigated in detail. This paper contains the descriptions related to Newton's Law of Cooling. We compared the Newton's temperature measurements and physical phenomena to evaluate his measurement lower than the boiling point, or 34 degrees N in Newton's temperature. In order to follow up the paper, we conducted Newton's experiments on forced convection using a small wind tunnel and tried to reproduce the original results, especially in the high-temperature region. We also conducted cooling experiments on natural convection. If the cooling times from the burning temperature of coal (192 degrees N) to the body temperature (12 degrees N) were 66, 80.5, and 132 min, the corresponding wind velocities were estimated to be 3.2, 2.2, and 0.7 m/s, respectively. For a wind speed of 0.7 m/s, natural convection cannot be neglected. The study also addresses the reason for why Newton published an anonymous paper on temperature measurement at temperatures higher than the boiling point of the water. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据