4.5 Article

Work Resumption After Epidemic Using Three-Way Decisions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 630-641

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-020-01006-5

关键词

Work resumption; Three-way decisions (TWDs); Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (DHHFLTSs); Entropy weight method

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71771155, 71971119]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Audit Information Engineering and Technology, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China [18CICA01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a novel three-way decision method for making decisions on whether enterprises should resume work post-epidemic. The method involves describing enterprise attributes, calculating attribute weights using the entropy weight method, and ultimately making decision results based on minimizing losses.
After the epidemic, all enterprises are faced with the difficult decision about whether the enterprise should resume work and production immediately, which is related to the safety and development of enterprises. The three-way decisions offer a novel study perspective to solve this problem. Firstly, we describe some relevant attributes of the enterprise with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, and construct double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic information systems for each enterprise. Secondly, we get the weights of attributes with the entropy weight method, and take the weighted aggregation of attributes information as the conditional probability that the enterprise is in a safe state. Next, we classify each enterprise according to its size. Considering the influence of different sizes of enterprises, we put forward the corresponding loss function matrix. Then we get the decision results about work resumption based on the principle of minimizing the loss, which demonstrates the practicability and effectiveness of our method. Finally, we compare the method proposed by us with the other method and discuss the advantages and limitations of our proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据