4.7 Article

Microbial and quality improvement of boiled gansi dish using carbon dots combined with radio frequency treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108835

关键词

Carbon dots; RF pasteurization; Boiled gansi dish; Microbiological amount; Texture

资金

  1. China Key Research Programs [2017YFD0400501]
  2. 111 Project [BP0719028]
  3. Yangzhou City Agricultural Key RD Program [YZ2019034]
  4. Jiangsu Province (China) Collaborative Innovation Center for Food Safety and Quality Control Industry Development Program
  5. Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory Project of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology [FMZ201803]
  6. Research Innovation Project for Postgraduates in Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_1846]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of carbon dots (CDs) combined with radio frequency (RF) was applied to pasteurize and reduce the microorganism population in order to improve the quality of boiled gansi dish. CDs were prepared from banana using hydrothermal method, and characterized by using TEM, XRD and FTIR. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) test showed CDs can efficiently inactivate Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis). This study also evaluated the effectiveness of five treatments, including CDs alone, CDs combined RF (CDRF) heating for different time (8 min, 12 min, and 16 min), and high pressure steam (HPS) sterilization of boiled gansi dish inoculated with B. subtilis. After CDRF treated for 8 min, 12 min, and 16 min, the center temperature of samples reached to 78.92, 87.77 and 93.82 degrees C, and the colony forming units (CFU) of B. subtilis reduced by 2.13, 3.62, and 4.63 log, respectively. Samples with CDRF12 treatment, exhibited better product quality as evidenced by reduced loss of texture, flavor, and sensory as compared with HPS sample. The results indicated that CDRF treatment has a great potential to produce packaged boiled gansi dish with high product quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据