4.7 Article

S100 calcium-binding protein A9 from tumor-associated macrophage enhances cancer stem cell-like properties of hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 148, 期 5, 页码 1233-1244

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33371

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; Stemness; tumor‐ associated macrophages

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672820, 81930074, 81972737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that TAMs can enhance the stem cell-like properties of HCC cells by upregulating the secreted protein S100A9, which in turn activates the NF-kB signaling pathway. Additionally, S100A9 can promote the recruitment of macrophages to HCC cells, suggesting a positive feedback loop between TAMs and HCC cells.
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are crucial components of the tumor microenvironment. They play vital roles in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression. However, the interactions between TAMs and HCC cells have not been fully characterized. In this study, TAMs were induced using human monocytic cell line THP-1 cells in vitro to investigate their functions in HCC progression. S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9), an inflammatory microenvironment-related secreted protein, was identified to be significantly upregulated in TAMs. S100A9 expression in tumor tissues was associated with poor survival of HCC patients. It could enhance the stem cell-like properties of HepG2 and MHCC-97H cells by activating nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathway through advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Furthermore, we found that, after treatment with S100A9, HepG2 and MHCC-97H cells recruited more macrophages via chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, which suggests a positive feedback between TAMs and HCC cells. Taken together, our findings reveal that TAMs could upregulate secreted protein S100A9 and enhance the stem cell-like properties of HCC cells and provide a potential therapeutic target for combating HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据