4.7 Article

Influence of moisture and amylose on the physicochemical properties of rice starch during heat treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.122

关键词

Starch; Thermal processing; Moisture content; Amylose; In vitro digestibility; Crystallinity

资金

  1. Open Project Program of Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China [SPFW2020YB03]
  2. Pre-Research Project of Innovation Project of Beijing Academy of Science and Technology [PXM2020_178305_000007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds to the Central Universities of China [2015ZCQSW-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moisture and amylose content play crucial roles in determining the quality of heat-treated starches. Increasing moisture content leads to higher paste transmittance, gelatinization temperature, and digestibility, while decreasing swelling power and enthalpy. Higher amylose content in rice starch decreases molecular order and gelatinization temperature, but increases resistant starch.
Moisture and amylose are important factors affecting the quality of heat-treated starches. The amylose content in heat-treated rice starch increased as moisture content (MC) increased from 8% to 30%, but decreased at MC of 70%. With the increase of MC, the paste transmittance, gelatinization temperature, and digestibility of starch increased, whereas the swelling power and enthalpy decreased. The long- and short-range molecular order and the digestive properties of starch with MC <= 30% changed moderately, but high MC (70%) gelatinized the starch and drastically changed the physicochemical properties. High amylose content in rice starch led to low long- and short-range molecular order, swelling power, and gelatinization temperature, but increased resistant starch. The results indicated that 30% of MC separates effects of heat treatment of starch, where low MC (<= 30%) and high amylose lowers digestibility, which is beneficial for diabetics, while high MC (>30%) promotes solubility and transparency. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据