4.6 Review

Biomimetic strategies for fabricating musculoskeletal tissue scaffolds: a review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06538-6

关键词

Musculoskeletal tissue engineering; Bioinspired materials; Biomimetic structures; Biofabrication techniques

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancements in musculoskeletal tissue engineering have been significant, with a focus on creating biomimetic microenvironments resembling native tissues. This paper reviews recent progress in fabrication strategies for biomimetic scaffolds, highlighting the importance of bioinspired materials, biomimetic structures, and biofabrication techniques. The development of hybrid biofabrication technologies for rapid manufacturing of 3D composite constructs is seen as a promising pathway towards efficient bench-to-bedside translation, with future scaffolds expected to possess modulated functions to adapt to dynamic physiological and mechanical environments for long-term regeneration and improved clinical outcomes.
The advancements in musculoskeletal tissue engineering have been substantial in recent decades. Fabrication of biomimetic microenvironment closely resembling the native tissues has been widely accepted as the golden rule for tissue engineering. This paper reviews recent progress in fabrication strategy of biomimetic scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering from three key aspects: bioinspired materials, biomimetic structures, and biofabrication techniques. The emerging hybrid biofabrication technologies that enable rapid manufacturing of 3D composite constructs with complex features will be a promising pathway toward highly efficient bench-to-bedside translation. Future biomimetic scaffolds should possess modulated functions in response to the dynamic physiological and mechanical environments. This is the prerequisite of future development of reliable, flexible, and cost-effective alternatives to achieve long-term regeneration and good clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据