4.5 Article

Distributed stubborn-set-membership filtering with a dynamic event-based scheme: The Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy framework

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3209

关键词

distributed set‐ membership filtering; dynamic event‐ triggered mechanism; outliers; stubborn constraints; Takagi‐ Sugeno fuzzy model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973219, 61933007]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1427000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents a novel stubborn set-membership filtering approach for discrete-time nonlinear systems with state-delays, unknown-but-bounded noises, and abnormal measurements. By using a dynamic event-triggered scheme and distributed fuzzy filter, the real state is obtained while mitigating the impact of abnormal measurements. The proposed algorithm for determining the ellipsoids and filter gains operates independently of global network topology information.
The article develops a novel stubborn set-membership filtering with the dynamic event-triggered scheme for discrete-time nonlinear systems with the state-delays, unknown-but-bounded noises as well as abnormal measurements. First, in comparison with traditional event schemes, a dynamic event-triggered scheme with a time-varying auxiliary offset variable in the threshold is employed to schedule the access token with the purpose of mitigating the communication burden. A novel fuzzy stubborn filter in a distributed way is then constructed to obtain the ellipsoid set including the real state while constraining the direct influence of abnormal measurements, which could come from outliers or a malicious modification by attackers. An algorithm with the form of recursive linear matrix inequalities is presented to determine the desired ellipsoids as well as the distributed filter gains, where the operation of the algorithm do not depend on the global information of network topology. Finally, the validity of the proposed scheme is illustrated via an inverted pendulum system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据