4.6 Article

An anisotropic viscoplasticity model for shale based on layered microstructure homogenization

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3167

关键词

anisotropy; creep; homogenization; shale; viscoplasticity

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [27205918]
  2. Total S.A.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the anisotropic viscoplastic behavior of shale and develops a two-scale constitutive model to capture this behavior. The model is validated with laboratory creep data and simulations of time-dependent borehole closure in shale formations.
Viscoplastic deformation of shale is frequently observed in many subsurface applications. Many studies have suggested that this viscoplastic behavior is anisotropic-specifically, transversely isotropic-and closely linked to the layered composite structure at the microscale. In this work, we develop a two-scale constitutive model for shale in which anisotropic viscoplastic behavior naturally emerges from semianalytical homogenization of a bilayer microstructure. The microstructure is modeled as a composite of soft layers, representing a ductile matrix formed by clay and organics, and hard layers, corresponding to a brittle matrix composed of stiff minerals. This layered microstructure renders the macroscopic behavior anisotropic, even when the individual layers are modeled with isotropic constitutive laws. Using a common correlation between clay and organic content and magnitude of creep, we apply a viscoplastic modified Cam-Clay plasticity model to the soft layers, while treating the hard layers as a linear elastic material to minimize the number of calibration parameters. We then describe the implementation of the proposed model in a standard material update subroutine. The model is validated with laboratory creep data on samples from three gas shale formations. We also demonstrate the computational behavior of the proposed model through simulation of time-dependent borehole closure in a shale formation with different bedding plane directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据