4.7 Article

Performance and safety of an integrated bihormonal artificial pancreas for fully automated glucose control at home

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 671-677

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12663

关键词

clinical trial; glucagon; glycaemic control; insulin therapy; type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (PCDIAB) [305654]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To assess the performance and safety of an integrated bihormonal artificial pancreas system consisting of one wearable device and two wireless glucose sensor transmitters during short-term daily use at home. Methods: Adult patients with type 1 diabetes using an insulin pump were invited to enrol in this randomized crossover study. Treatment with the artificial pancreas started with a day and night in the clinical research centre, followed by 3 days at home. The control period consisted of 4 days of insulin pump therapy at home with blinded continuous glucose monitoring for data collection. Days 2-4 were predefined as the analysis period, with median glucose as the primary outcome. Results: A total of 10 patients completed the study. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] glucose level was similar for the two treatments [7.3 (7.0-7.6) mmol/l for the artificial pancreas vs. 7.7 (7.0-9.0) mmol/l for the control; p= 0.123]. The median (IQR) percentage of time spent in euglycaemia (3.9-10 mmol/l) was longer during use of the artificial pancreas [84.7 (82.2-87.8)% for the artificial pancreas vs. 68.5 (57.9-83.6)% for the control; p= 0.007]. Time in hypoglycaemia was 1.3 (0.2-3.2)% for the artificial pancreas and 2.4 (0.4-10.3)% for the control treatment (p= 0.139). Separate analysis of daytime and night-time showed that the improvements were mainly achieved during the night. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that our integrated artificial pancreas provides better glucose control than insulin pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes at home and that the treatment is safe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据