4.7 Article

Combined ultrasound and heat pretreatment improve the enzymatic hydrolysis of clam (Aloididae aloidi) and the flavor of hydrolysates

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102596

关键词

Aloididae aloidi; Ultrasound pretreatment; Heat pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Flavor

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0400603, 2017YFD0400106]
  2. Scientific Research Public Welfare Foundation of Liaoning Province [20170035]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201808210350]
  4. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pretreatments with ultrasound, heat, and combinations of heat-ultrasound and ultrasound-heat were investigated on clam flesh enzymolysis, with UP pretreatment yielding the highest DH value and HP-UP pretreatment obtaining the highest soluble peptide content. HP pretreatment promoted the formation of pleasant volatile compounds.
The effects of pretreatments with ultrasound (UP), heat (HP), and combinations of heat-ultrasound (HP-UP) and ultrasound-heat (UP-HP) on the flesh enzymolysis of clam (Aloididae aloidi) and the flavor characteristics of hydrolysates were investigated. The optimum UP pretreatment conditions for the hydrolysis were obtained at ultrasound power of 500 W, ultrasound time of 20 min, and liquid/solid (L/S) ratio of 2:1 (v/w), yielded 41.33% of hydrolysis degree (DH). Among the different pretreatments, the UP pretreatment had the highest DH value, while the HP-UP pretreatment obtained the highest soluble peptide content. The UP pretreatment efficiently enhanced the contents of taste-active components, including free amino acids, 5?-nucleotides, and succinic acid. The HP pretreatment promoted the formation of pleasant volatile compounds and reduced the content of unpleasant volatile compounds, such as 1-octen-3-ol and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol. The combined HP-UP pretreatment was an effective method for improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of clam and the flavor of hydrolysate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据