Exploiting semantic relationships for unsupervised expansion of sentiment lexicons

The literature in sentiment analysis has widely assumed that semantic relationships between words cannot be effectively exploited to produce satisfactory sentiment lexicon expansions. This assumption stems from the fact that words considered to be close in a semantic space (e.g., word embeddings) may present completely opposite polarities, which might suggest that sentiment information in such spaces is either too faint, or at least not readily exploitable. Our main contribution in this paper is a rigorous and robust challenge to this assumption: by proposing a set of theoretical hypotheses and corroborating them with strong experimental evidence, we demonstrate that semantic relationships can be effectively used for good lexicon expansion. Based on these results, our second contribution is a novel, simple, and yet effective lexicon-expansion strategy based on semantic relationships extracted from word embeddings. This strategy is able to substantially enhance the lexicons, whilst overcoming the major problem of lexicon coverage. We present an extensive experimental evaluation of sentence-level sentiment analysis, comparing our approach to sixteen state-of-the-art (SOTA) lexicon-based and five lexicon expansion methods, over twenty datasets. Results show that in the vast majority of cases our approach outperforms the alternatives, achieving coverage of almost 100% and gains of about 26% against the best baselines. Moreover, our unsupervised approach performed competitively against SOTA supervised sentiment analysis methods, mainly in scenarios with scarce information. Finally, in a cross-dataset comparison, our approach turned out to be as competitive as (i.e., statistically tie with) state-of-the-art supervised solutions such as pre-trained transformers (BERT), even without relying on any training (labeled) data. Indeed in small datasets or in datasets with scarce information (short messages), our solution outperformed the supervised ones by large margins. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.