4.7 Article

EtherTwin: Blockchain-based Secure Digital Twin Information Management

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102425

关键词

Distributed ledgers; Blockchain; Digital twin; Industry 4.0; Decentralized application

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy [16KN085725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital Twins, as complex digital representations of assets, are becoming more widespread as industrial processes digitize. The development of new secure data sharing models is necessary to address the complex ecosystem of interacting Digital Twins and lifecycle parties. Decentralized Applications are uniquely suited to tackle these sharing challenges while ensuring availability, integrity, and confidentiality.
Digital Twins are complex digital representations of assets that are used by a variety of organizations across the Industry 4.0 value chain. As the digitization of industrial processes advances, Digital Twins will become widespread. As a result, there is a need to develop new secure data sharing models for a complex ecosystem of interacting Digital Twins and lifecycle parties. Decentralized Applications are uniquely suited to address these sharing challenges while ensuring availability, integrity and confidentiality. They rely on distributed ledgers and decentralized databases for data storage and processing, avoiding single points of trust. To tackle the need for decentralized sharing of Digital Twin data, this work proposes an owner-centric decentralized sharing model. A formal access control model addresses integrity and confidentiality aspects based on Digital Twin components and lifecycle requirements. With our prototypical implementation EtherTwin we show how to overcome the numerous implementation challenges associated with fully decentralized data sharing, enabling management of Digital Twin components and their associated information. For validation, the prototype is evaluated based on an industry use case and semi-structured expert interviews.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据