4.7 Article

Fusion in stock market prediction: A decade survey on the necessity, recent developments, and potential future directions

期刊

INFORMATION FUSION
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 95-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.019

关键词

Stock market prediction; Information fusion; Feature fusion; Model fusion; Machine learning; Deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investing in financial markets aims to gain higher benefits, but predicting market dynamics is challenging due to the complex nature of the market. Fusion techniques can integrate data and characteristics to enhance prediction accuracy in stock market applications. Major applications include stock price prediction, risk analysis, index prediction, and portfolio management.
Investment in a financial market is aimed at getting higher benefits; this complex market is influenced by a large number of events wherein the prediction of future market dynamics is challenging. The investors' etiquettes towards stock market may demand the need of studying various associated factors and extract the useful information for reliable forecasting. Fusion can be considered as an approach to integrate data or characteristics, in general, and enhance the prediction based on the combinational approach that can aid each other. We conduct a systematic approach to present a survey for the years 2011-2020 by considering articles that have used fusion techniques for various stock market applications and broadly categorize them into information fusion, feature fusion, and model fusion. The major applications of stock market include stock price and trend prediction, risk analysis and return forecasting, index prediction, as well as portfolio management. We also provide an infographic overview of fusion in stock market prediction and extend our survey for other finely addressed financial prediction problems. Based on our surveyed articles, we provide potential future directions and concluding remarks on the significance of applying fusion in stock market.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据