4.7 Article

Efficiency of bronsted acidic ionic liquids in the dissolution and depolymerization of lignin from rice husk into high value-added products

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112885

关键词

Lignin; Rice husk; Ionic liquids; Delignification; Depolymerizations

资金

  1. University of Malaya [GPF053B2018]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, MOHE [FP071-2018A]
  3. University Malaya Centre for Ionic Liquids (UMCiL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic agricultural waste, like rice husk, is generated abundantly from rice milling industries. It is no longer mere waste but has become a treasure trove of outstanding potentials for sustainable environment growth. In this study, a series of Bronsted acidic ionic liquids (BAILs) were synthesized, characterized and used as a medium solvent to dissolve rice husk. Fractionation of rice husk into lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose was successfully achieved after 6 h of stirring at 100 degrees C. About 78 % and 53 % of the regenerated lignin were effectively extracted from rice husk by 1-methyl-3-(3-sulfopropyl)-imidazolium chloride, [C3SO3HMIM]Cl and 1-methyl-3- (3-sulfopropyl) imidazolium acetate, [C3SO3HMIM] [Ace] respectively, while 1-methyl-3-(3-sulfo propyl)-imidazolium hydrogen sulfate, [C3SO3HMIM][HSO4] only extracted 11 % (based on the original rice husk). The regenerated lignin and cellulose were characterized using FTIR and TGA. Among the BAILs, [C3SO3HMIM]Cl was found to be a good medium solvent to extract lignin from rice husk and could be recycled up to four times. The regenerated lignin was further depolymerized using the synthesized BAILs at 120 degrees C (1 h) to generate low molecular weight aromatic products, which were analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). During depolymerization process, [C3SO3HMIM] [HSO4] was identified as an excellent solvent to depolymerize the lignin into low molecular weight aromatic products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据