4.6 Article

Novel Quality-Relevant Process Monitoring based on Dynamic Locally Linear Embedding Concurrent Canonical Correlation Analysis

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 49, 页码 21439-21457

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03492

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61703371]
  2. Social Development Project of Zhejiang Provincial Public Technology Research [LGF19F030004]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry (Jiangnan University), Ministry of Education, PRC [APCLI1805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quality-relevant process monitoring has emerged as a powerful tool in ensuring product quality for industrial processes. However, most industrial processes exhibit dynamic and nonlinear characteristics. A novel quality-relevant monitoring named dynamic locally linear embedding concurrent canonical correlation analysis (DLCCCA) is proposed for nonlinear dynamic processes. First, local structure information on the time-lagged process and quality variables is extracted through locally linear embedding (LLE). Second, the extracted structure information is incorporated into canonical correlation analysis (CCA) through formulating a new optimization objective. Consequently, the process data space is decomposed into predictable quality subspace, quality-irrelevant process subspace, and unpredictable quality subspace. Third, the unpredictable quality subspace and quality-irrelevant process subspace are further decomposed using principal component analysis (PCA). From the decomposed subspaces, Hotelling's T-2 and Q statistics are established for quality-relevant process monitoring. Moreover, kernel density estimation (KDE) is utilized to determine the corresponding threshold for each statistic. DLCCCA combines the merits of both LLE and CCA. Two case studies are carried out to illustrate the superior performance of DLCCCA by comparison with other relevant methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据