4.7 Article

Perceptual-Aware Sketch Simplification Based on Integrated VGG Layers

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2930512

关键词

Feature extraction; Semantics; Task analysis; Generative adversarial networks; Visualization; Lighting; Image segmentation; Convolutional neural network; perceptual awareness; sketch simplification

资金

  1. NSFC [61772206, U1611461, 61472145]
  2. Guangdong R&D key project of China [2018B010107003]
  3. Guangdong High-level personnel program [2016TQ03X319]
  4. Guangdong NSF [2017A030311027]
  5. Guangzhou key project in industrial technology [201802010027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a method using multi-layer perceptual loss in deep learning is proposed for simplifying sketches while preserving important global structures and details. The approach involves designing a multi-layer discriminator and learning weights automatically to differentiate sketches and clean lines effectively.
Deep learning has been recently demonstrated as an effective tool for raster-based sketch simplification. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to simplify extremely rough sketches. We found that a simplification network trained with a simple loss, such as pixel loss or discriminator loss, may fail to retain the semantically meaningful details when simplifying a very sketchy and complicated drawing. In this paper, we show that, with a well-designed multi-layer perceptual loss, we are able to obtain aesthetic and neat simplification results preserving semantically important global structures as well as fine details without blurriness and excessive emphasis on local structures. To do so, we design a multi-layer discriminator by fusing all VGG feature layers to differentiate sketches and clean lines. The weights used in layer fusing are automatically learned via an intelligent adjustment mechanism. Furthermore, to evaluate our method, we compare our method to state-of-the-art methods through multiple experiments, including visual comparison and intensive user study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据