4.7 Article

An MPC-Based Control Strategy for Electric Vehicle Battery Cooling Considering Energy Saving and Battery Lifespan

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 14657-14673

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3032989

关键词

Energy saving; intelligent model predict control; lithium-ion battery; battery thermal management system; state of health

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy [KF2031]
  2. Technological Innovation and Application Project of Chongqing [cstc2018jszx-cyztzx0130]
  3. National Key RAMP
  4. D Program of China [2018YFB0106102, 2018YFB0106104]
  5. NSF of China [U1864212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to keep a lithium-ion battery within optimal temperature range for excellent performance and long lifespan, it is necessary to have an effective control strategy for a battery thermal management system (BTMS) consisting of electric pump, cooling plate and radiator. In this paper, a control-oriented model for BTMS is established, and an intelligent model predictive control (IMPC) strategy is developed by integrating a neural network-based vehicle speed predictor and a target battery temperature adaptor based on Pareto boundaries. The strategy is applied to plug-in electric vehicles operating in electric vehicle mode. Results show its superiority in terms of battery temperature control, battery lifespan extension and energy saving. Under the new European driving cycle, average difference between the real-time battery temperature under the novel IMPC and its target temperature is 0.26 degrees C, and maximum temperature difference among modules is 1.03 degrees C. Moreover, compared with the on-off controller, model predictive control (MPC), and MPC with VSP, state of health under IMPC at the end of the driving cycle is 0.016%, 0.012%, and 0.008% higher, respectively. At this moment, the energy consumption of IMPC is 24.5% and 14.1% lower than that of the on-off controller and traditional MPC, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据