4.7 Article

Imperfect Preventive Maintenance Policies With Unpunctual Execution

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1480-1492

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TR.2020.2983415

关键词

Maintenance engineering; Hazards; Planning; Numerical models; Optimization; Warranties; Analytical models; Finite horizon; hazard rate adjustment; imperfect preventive maintenance (PM); infinite horizon; unpunctual execution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71532008, 71971181]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [T32-101/15-R, CityU 11203519]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional maintenance planning problems usually presume that preventive maintenance (PM) policies will be executed exactly as planned. In reality, however, maintainers often deviate from the intended PM policy, resulting in unpunctual PM executions that may reduce maintenance effectiveness. This article studies two imperfect PM policies with unpunctual executions for infinite and finite planning horizons, respectively. Under the former policy, imperfect PM actions are periodically performed and the system is preventively replaced at the last PM instant. The objective is to determine the optimal number of PM actions and associated PM interval so as to minimize the long-run average cost rate. However, the latter policy specifies that a system is subject to periodic PM activities within a finite planning horizon and there is no PM activity at the end of the horizon. The aim is then to identify the optimal number of PM activities to minimize the expected total maintenance cost. In this article, we discuss the modeling and optimization of the two unpunctual PM policies and then explore the impact of unpunctual executions on the optimal PM decisions and corresponding maintenance expenses in an analytical or numerical way. The resulting insights are helpful for practitioners to adjust their PM plans when unpunctual executions are anticipated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据