4.8 Article

3-D Facial Landmarks Detection for Intelligent Video Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 578-586

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.2966513

关键词

Face; Three-dimensional displays; Detectors; Computer architecture; Convolution; Task analysis; Computational modeling; Convolution block; convolutional neural network (CNN); facial landmarks; stacked hourglass

资金

  1. University of Ulsan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a facial-landmark detector based on a stacked hourglass network and residual networks, which improves accuracy by modifying hourglass modules and using 1 x 1 convolution layers in branch streams. The proposed network outperforms other state-of-the-art methods on 3-D face alignment datasets.
Facial landmark detection is a fundamental research topic in computer vision that is widely adopted in many applications. Recently, thanks to the development of convolutional neural networks, this topic has been largely improved. This article proposes facial-landmark detector, which is based on a state-of-the-art architecture for landmark localization called stacked hourglass network, to obtain accurate facial landmark-points. More specifically, this article uses residual networks as the backbone instead of a 7 x 7 convolution layer. Additionally, it modifies the hourglass modules by using the residual-dense blocks in the mainstream for capturing more efficient features and the 1 x 1 convolution layers in the branch streams for reducing the model size and computational time, instead of the original residual blocks. The proposed architecture also enhances the features from modified hourglass modules with finer-resolution features via a lateral connection to generate more accurate results. The proposed network can outperform other state-of-the-art methods on the AFLW2000-3D dataset and the LS3D-W dataset, the largest three-dimensional (3-D face) alignment dataset to date.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据