4.8 Article

Noise-Immune Model Identification and State-of-Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Battery Using Bilinear Parameterization

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 312-323

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2962429

关键词

Battery management; bias compensation; model identification; noise; state of charge (SOC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1864202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate estimation of state of charge (SOC) in battery systems is crucial for safe and efficient utilization. This article examines the impact of measurement noises on model parameter identification and SOC estimation, proposing a novel parameterization method to address noise-induced biases and improving immunity to noise corruption.
Accurate estimation of state of charge (SOC) is critical to the safe and efficient utilization of a battery system. Model-based SOC observers have been widely used due to their high accuracy and robustness, but they rely on a well-parameterized battery model. This article scrutinizes the effect of measurement noises on model parameter identification and SOC estimation. A novel parameterization method combining instrumental variable (IV) estimation and bilinear principle is proposed to compensate for the noise-induced biases of model identification. Specifically, the IV estimator is used to reformulate an overdetermined system so as to allow coestimating the model parameters and noise variances. The coestimation problem is then decoupled into two linear subproblems which are solved efficiently by a two-stage least squares algorithm in a recursive manner. The parameterization method is further combined with a Luenberger observer to estimate the SOC in real time. Simulations and experiments are performed to validate the proposed method. Results reveal that the proposed method is superior to existing method in terms of the immunity to noise corruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据