A Novel Conflict Measurement in Decision-Making and Its Application in Fault Diagnosis

Dempster-Shafer evidence (DSE) theory, which allows combining pieces of evidence from different data sources to derive a degree of belief function that is a type of fuzzy measure, is a general framework for reasoning with uncertainty. In this framework, how to optimally manage the conflicts of multiple pieces of evidence in DSE remains an open issue to support decision making. The existing conflict measurement approaches can achieve acceptable outcomes but do not fully consider the optimization at the decision-making level using the novel measurement of conflicts. In this article, we propose a novel evidential correlation coefficient (ECC) for belief functions by measuring the conflict between two pieces of evidence in decision making. Then, we investigate the properties of our proposed evidential correlation and conflict coefficients, which are all proven to satisfy the desirable properties for conflict measurement, including nonnegativity, symmetry, boundedness, extreme consistency, and insensitivity to refinement. We also present several examples and comparisons to demonstrate the superiority of our proposed ECC method. Finally, we apply the proposed ECC in a decision-making application of motor rotor fault diagnosis, which verifies the practicability and effectiveness of our proposed novel measurement.

Automated summary

The article introduces a novel evidential correlation coefficient (ECC) for belief functions, which measures the conflict between two pieces of evidence in decision making. The properties of ECC are proven to satisfy desirable characteristics for conflict measurement, and examples and comparisons demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method. The application of ECC in motor rotor fault diagnosis showcases its practicality and effectiveness.