4.6 Article

Zebrafish Larva Orientation and Smooth Aspiration Control for Microinjection

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2999896

关键词

Microinjection; Micromanipulators; Head; Adaptation models; Embryo; Organisms; Zebrafish larva; micromanipulation; microfluidics; backstepping control; adaptive control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61933008]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Robotics
  3. System (HIT)
  4. Key Laboratory of Micro-systems and Micro-structures Manufacturing of Ministry of Education (HIT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel zebrafish larva manipulation technique that achieves high success rate and reduces damage by orienting and aspirating zebrafish larvae. The method offers advantages of low cost, easy implementability, and good stability.
Objective: The zebrafish has been proven to be a significant model organism in various research fields. For investigating the in vivo properties of biologics within zebrafish with developed organs, an automated zebrafish larva organ injection system is crucially needed. However, current zebrafish larva manipulation techniques cannot accomplish this operation efficiently and continuously. Methods: In this paper, we present a novel zebrafish larva manipulation technique with two key steps in the microinjection system: orienting and aspirating zebrafish larvae automatically. The orientation control is realized in a customized microfluidic chip, after which the larva moves tail-first until reaching the channel exit. Then a dynamic model of larva aspiration is established and an adaptive robust controller is designed. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that high success rate can be reached and damage to larva body is reduced. Conclusion: The presented strategy is capable of orienting and aspirating zebrafish larvae smoothly and efficiently. Significance: The proposed methods have the advantage of low cost, easy implementability and good stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据