4.7 Article

Evaluation of Fiber Optic Raman Scattering Distributed Temperature Sensor Between-196 and 400 °C

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 1527-1533

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3016322

关键词

Temperature sensors; Optical fiber sensors; Optical fibers; Temperature measurement; Temperature distribution; Cryogenic temperatures; high temperatures; optical fiber; optical sensor; OTDR; Raman scattering; temperature sensor

资金

  1. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq)
  2. Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement of the Ministry of Education (CAPES)
  3. Pernambuco Science and Technology Support Foundation (FACEPE)
  4. PPGEE at Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distributed fiber optic temperature sensor based on spontaneous Raman scattering is experimental evaluated over a wide range of temperatures, providing accurate values and fine resolution in temperature measurement.
Distributed temperature sensors have been proposed for a wide variety of scientific and industrial applications and represent an important technology for modern infrastructures. Due to the range of potential applications, distributed fiber optic sensors based on spontaneous Raman scattering have been studied both theoretically and experimentally. This article presents the experimental evaluation of a distributed fiber optic temperature sensor based on spontaneous Raman scattering over a wide temperature range, from -196 degrees C to +400 degrees C. The sensor is implemented using a commercial OTDR, a standard EDFA amplifier and a standard optical fiber link. Besides, a special type of optical fiber for high temperature operation, featuring metallic coating, is also assessed as the sensor element. The integrity of the fibers following the exposure to the extreme temperatures is analyzed. The results provide values for the sensitivity, accuracy and resolution of the sensor in the wide range of temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据