4.6 Article

On the Use of Tiny Convolutional Neural Networks for Human-Expert-Level Classification Performance in Sonar Imagery

期刊

IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 236-260

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2019.2963041

关键词

Machine learning; neural networks; pattern recognition; synthetic aperture sonar

资金

  1. NATO Allied Command Transformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using tiny CNNs with significantly fewer parameters, this study demonstrates classification performance that matches or even surpasses that of human domain experts. The research represents the first large-scale classification study in the sonar domain, showing that CNNs have strong generalization ability in challenging environments, which will significantly impact their utilization in the underwater remote-sensing community.
Efficient convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are designed and trained for an underwater target classification task with synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery collected at sea. The main contribution is demonstrating that classification performance that matches, and even surpasses, the level achievable by a human domain expert obtained from tiny CNNs with three to six orders of magnitude fewer parameters than have traditionally been used in the literature. In doing so, this work represents the first large-scale classification study in the sonar domain to establish a favorable comparison between automated algorithm performance and human ability. Extensive experimental results on challenging real-world SAS image data sets collected in diverse environments and conditions demonstrate that the CNNs possess strong generalization ability. These findings should significantly impact the manner in which CNNs are utilized in the underwater remote-sensing community. To wit, the tiny CNNs proposed here provide a blueprint for achieving excellent classification performance even with limited computing power or limited data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据