4.6 Review

Growth and reproduction in mesopelagic fishes: a literature synthesis

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 765-781

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa247

关键词

growth; life history; mesopelagic fishes; midwater fisheries; reproduction

资金

  1. Audacious Project housed at TED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mesopelagic zone in the world's oceans is a vast area holding abundant vertebrates, but our understanding of the life history of these animals is limited. Current research is focused mostly on myctophids, with other groups lacking investigation. Research is concentrated in the northern hemisphere, with little coverage in the Indo-Pacific region and the poles.
The mesopelagic zone covers a vast expanse of the World's oceans and contains some of the most abundant vertebrates on the planet. This midwater region is central to the transfer of energy and carbon between the atmosphere and the deep, yet there are large knowledge gaps in our understanding of the life history of its animals. Here we synthesize the current state of knowledge of research on age, growth, and reproduction of mesopelagic fishes, the basic biological information fundamental to understanding the population dynamics of species in this ecosystem. Collectively, two-thirds of life history research on mesopelagic fishes has been undertaken on myctophids, yet many other abundant and important groups are lacking research. There are generally hotspots of mesopelagic fish research mostly centred in the northern hemisphere, with little to no coverage in the Indo-Pacific region nor the poles. Furthermore, the effects of some anthropogenic stressors-chiefly climate change and resource extraction-on the life history of the animals in this zone is uncertain and needs to be considered. Knowledge of growth and reproduction are key traits required for a holistic assessment and understanding of this ecosystem, and hopefully this synthesis will provide a springboard for greater focus in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据