4.6 Article

Quantifying habitat preference of bottom trawling gear

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 172-184

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa207

关键词

beam trawl fishing; benthic impact; habitat preference; INLA; pulse fishing; VMS

资金

  1. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)
  2. Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality (LNV) [1300021172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continental shelves are heavily impacted by bottom trawling, affecting a quarter of wild marine species. Understanding suitable fishing grounds for bottom trawlers is crucial in marine spatial planning discussions, and studying the habitat preference of fisheries is important for supporting fisheries and evaluating benthic impacts.
Continental shelves around the world are subject to intensive bottom trawling. Demersal fish assemblages inhabiting these shelves account for one-fourth of landed wild marine species. Increasing spatial claims for nature protection and wind farm energy suppresses, however, the area available to fisheries. In this marine spatial planning discussion, it is essential to understand what defines suitable fishing grounds for bottom trawlers. We developed a statistical methodology to study the habitat preference of a fishery, accounting for spatial correlation naturally present in fisheries data using high-resolution location data of fishing vessels and environmental variables. We focused on two types of beam trawls to target sole using mechanical or electrical stimulation. Although results indicated only subtle differences in habitat preference between the two gear types, a clear difference in spatial distribution of the two gears was predicted. We argue that this change is driven by both changes in habitat preference as well as a change in target species distribution. We discuss modelling of fisheries' habitat preference in light of marine spatial planning and as support in benthic impact assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据