4.4 Article

Behavioural and heart rate responses to stressors in two populations of Little Penguins that differ in levels of human disturbance and predation risk

期刊

IBIS
卷 163, 期 3, 页码 858-874

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12925

关键词

allostasis; heart rate; predators; seabird; stress response

资金

  1. Adelaide and Mt Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board, the Nature Foundation and Birds SA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the stress response of Little Penguins to an introduced predator and conspecific in two different habitats in South Australia. The results showed that individuals from high-disturbance colonies exhibited higher vigilance and heart rate responses compared to low-disturbance colonies.
Species that are constantly exposed to disturbances, such as human disturbance or non-lethal contacts with predators or conspecifics, can experience chronic stress. Within a species range, variation in the frequency and predictability of such disturbances can lead to population differences in stress responses. Here, we investigated the stress response of Little Penguins Eudyptula minor to an introduced predator and a conspecific at two South Australian colonies that differed in habitat, conspecific density, levels of human disturbance and predation risk (high, low). We used playback experiments of Cat Felis catus or Little Penguin calls and recorded the behaviour and physiological (heart rate) response of adults in relation to playback type (Cat, Penguin) as well as habitat characteristics (habitat type, nest type, nest visibility) and number of conspecifics present. Our results showed that individuals from the high-disturbance colony (also living in a mixed habitat with fewer neighbours) exhibited higher vigilance and heart rate responses than individuals from the low-disturbance colony (living in a closed habitat with a high number of neighbours). Our results highlight that guidelines for managing penguin species cannot be generalized across populations and need to be colony-specific.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据