4.7 Article

Impaired Endothelial Function in Patients With Postural Tachycardia Syndrome

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 77, 期 3, 页码 1001-1009

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16238

关键词

blood; heart rate; nitric oxide; syndrome; tachycardia

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1 TR000445]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients with PoTS have significantly reduced flow-mediated dilation compared with healthy controls, suggesting that PoTS is characterized by endothelial dysfunction in conduit arteries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate endothelial function in postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS), a poorly understood chronic condition characterized by a state of consistent orthostatic tachycardia (delta heart rate >= 30 beats per minute) upon standing without orthostatic hypotension. Nineteen patients with PoTS and 9 healthy controls were studied after 3 days of a fixed, caffeine-free, normal sodium (150 milliequivalents/day) diet. All participants underwent autonomic function testing, including sinus arrhythmia, valsalva maneuver, hyperventilation, cold pressor, handgrip, and a standing test with catecholamine measurements, followed by endothelial function testing. We analyzed 3 measures of endothelial function: percent brachial flow-mediated dilation, digital pulsatile arterial tonometry, and postischemic percent leg blood flow. Flow-mediated dilation was significantly lower in patients with PoTS (6.23 +/- 3.54% for PoTS) than in healthy controls (10.6 +/- 4.37% for controls versus, P=0.014). PoTS and controls had similar digital pulsatile arterial tonometry (1.93 +/- 0.40 arbitrary units for controls versus 2.13 +/- 0.63 arbitrary units for PoTS). PoTS had similar but suggestive percent leg blood flow to controls (313 +/- 158% for PoTS versus 468 +/- 236% for controls, P=0.098). Patients with PoTS have significantly reduced flow-mediated dilation compared with healthy controls, suggesting that PoTS is characterized by endothelial dysfunction in conduit arteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据