4.7 Article

The Hypothalamic Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Is Sufficient but Not Necessary for the Regulation of Energy Balance and Glucose Homeostasis in Mice

期刊

DIABETES
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 372-384

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db16-1102

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Research Chairs program
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [123391]
  3. National Institutes of Health [7R01DK082480, 1R01DK107652, 4R01DK097361]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmacological activation of the hypothalamic glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) promotes weight loss and improves glucose tolerance. This demonstrates that the hypothalamic GLP-1R is sufficient but does not show whether it is necessary for the effects of exogenous GLP-1R agonists (GLP-1RA) or endogenous GLP-1 on these parameters. To address this, we crossed mice harboring floxed Glp1r alleles to mice expressing Nkx2.1-Cre to knock down Glp1r expression throughout the hypothalamus (GLP-1RKD(Delta Nkx21cre)). We also generated mice lacking Glp1r expression specifically in two GLP-1RA-responsive hypothalamic feeding nuclei/cell types, the paraventricular nucleus (GLP-1RKD(Delta Sim1cre)) and proopiomelanocortin neurons (GLP-1RKD(Delta POMCcre)). Chow-fed GLP-1RKD(Delta Nkx21cre) mice exhibited increased food intake and energy expenditure with no net effect on body weight. When fed a high-fat diet, these mice exhibited normal food intake but elevated energy expenditure, yielding reduced weight gain.. None of these phenotypes were observed in GLP-1RKD(Delta Sim1cre) and GLP-1RKD(Delta POMCcre) mice. The acute anorectic and glucose tolerance effects of peripherally dosed GLP-1RA exendin-4 and liraglutide were preserved in all mouse lines. Chronic liraglutide treatment reduced body weight in chow-fed GLP-1RKD(Delta Nkx21cre) mice, but this effect was attenuated with high-fat diet feeding. In sum, classic homeostatic control regions are sufficient but not individually necessary for the effects of GLP-1RA on nutrient homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据