4.2 Article

The tribological behavior of iron tailing sand grain contacts in dry, water and biopolymer immersed states

期刊

GRANULAR MATTER
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-020-01068-0

关键词

Micromechanical tests; Young's modulus; Interparticle friction; Guar gum; Roughness; Abrasion

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 11210419, CityU 11214218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental investigation on the tribological behavior of tailing grain contacts revealed that factors such as saturation conditions, biopolymer coating, and abrasion significantly influence the friction. Inter-particle friction was found to be higher in tailing grains compared to quartz grains, with abrasion, high roughness, and biopolymer coating identified as major factors affecting the frictional behavior.
We investigated experimentally the tribological behavior of tailing grain contacts using a micromechanical apparatus which allows high precision of force and displacement measurements to derive contact stiffness. A technique was developed to apply biopolymer coating to the grain surfaces and the emphasis of the study was placed on the investigation of the influences of saturation conditions, the presence of polymer-based coating, and the abrasion on the frictional behavior of the grains. Material characterization was based on interferometry, micro-indentation and elemental composition analyses. Elastoplastic displacements dominated the first cycles of normal loading and the Young's modulus was interpreted based on different contact models. The tailing grains showed significantly higher inter-particle friction compared with that of quartz grains. Three major characteristics which influenced the frictional behavior of the grain contacts were the abrasion, which was more dominant in the first loading cycles, the high roughness of the grains and the presence of the biopolymer coating which increased significantly the friction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据