4.7 Article

PPARδ Is Required for Exercise to Attenuate Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Mice

期刊

DIABETES
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 519-528

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db15-1657

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [CUHK2/CRF/12G, CUHK464712, CUHK465611, T12-402/13-N]
  2. CUHK [2015.2.046]
  3. CUHK Lui Che Woo Foundation
  4. National Basic Research Program of China 973 grant [2012CB517805]
  5. National Nature Science Foundation of China [91339117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physical activity has profound benefits on health, especially on cardiometabolic wellness. Experiments in rodents with trained exercise have shown that exercise improves vascular function and reduces vascular inflammation by modulating the balance between nitric oxide (NO) and oxidative stress. However, the upstream regulator of exercise induced vascular benefits is unclear. We aimed to investigate the involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR delta) in exercise-induced vascular functional improvement. We show that PPAR delta is a crucial mediator for exercise to exert a beneficial effect on the vascular endothelium in diabetic mice. In db/db mice and high-fat diet-induced obese mice, 4 weeks of treadmill exercise restored endothelium-dependent vasodilation of aortas and flow-mediated vasodilation in mesenteric resistance arteries, whereas genetic ablation of Ppard abolished such improvements. Exercise induces AMPK activation and subsequent PPAR delta activation, which help to reduce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and oxidative stress, thus increasing NO bioavailability in endothelial cells and vascular tissues. Chemical chaperones 4-phenylbutyric acid and tauroursodeoxycholic acid decrease ER stress and protect against endothelial dysfunction in diabetic mice. The results demonstrate that PPAR delta-mediated inhibition of ER stress contributes to the vascular benefits of exercise and provides potentially effective targets for treating diabetic vasculopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据