4.8 Article

Ranking alien species based on their risks of causing environmental impacts: A global assessment of alien ungulates

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1003-1016

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15467

关键词

EICAT assessments; impact classification; introduced species; invasive species; IUCN

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_179491, 31BD30_184114]
  2. Belmont Forum-BiodivERsA International joint call project InvasiBES [PCI2018-092939]
  3. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action TD1209 [ECOST-STSM-TD1209-030417-084509]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31BD30_184114, 31003A_179491] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to efficiently manage alien species, prioritizing those that cause the most severe impacts is essential. By classifying impacts of alien species, it can aid in distinguishing between different species for prioritization.
For an efficient allocation of the limited resources to alien species management, the most damaging species should be prioritised. Comparing alien species based on their impacts is not straightforward, as the same species can cause different types and magnitudes of impacts when introduced to different contexts, making it difficult to summarise its overall impact. The Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) systematically summarises and compares detrimental impacts caused by alien populations to native biota and has been adopted by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. For each alien species, all reported impacts to native populations within the introduced range are classified into five levels of severity, from negligible impact to irreversible local extinction. Currently, EICAT only compares alien species based on their highest impact, thereby ignoring variation in impact magnitudes. Here, we used information on the variation in impact magnitudes of alien species to estimate their risks to cause high impacts if introduced to a novel environment. We demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by classifying the global impacts of alien ungulates. We found impact reports for 27 of the 66 alien ungulate species established worldwide, highlighting substantial knowledge gaps in invasion science. We classified a total of 441 impacts to native fauna and flora caused by these 27 species. Twenty-six of the species were found to cause harmful impacts (native population declines or local extinctions). Mouflon (Ovis orientalis, Gmelin, 1774) and dromedary (Camelus dromedarius, Linnaeus, 1758) had a higher risk of causing local extinctions if introduced to a novel environment than sika deer (Cervus nippon, Temminck, 1838) and goats (Capra hircus, Linnaeus, 1758). Including risk of high impacts allows to discriminate among species with the same EICAT classification and improves alien species prioritisation for management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据