4.7 Article

Global Estimates of Marine Gross Primary Production Based on Machine Learning Upscaling of Field Observations

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GB006718

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratoire d'Excellence LabexMER [ANR10-LABX-19]
  2. French government under the program Investissements d'Avenir
  3. National Key and Development Program of China [2016YFA0601201]
  4. China NSF [41890803, U1805241]
  5. Chinese State Scholarship Fund [201806310052]
  6. NASA [OBB NNX16AR48 G, 80NSSC17K0663]
  7. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global oceanic gross primary production (GPP) has been studied using two satellite-based models, showing that GPP(17 Delta) is 1.5-2.2 times larger than oceanic net primary production (NPP) and comparable to land GPP. The discrepancy between GPP(17 Delta) and GPP(LD) simulations can be partially explained by methodological biases.
Approximately half of global primary production occurs in the ocean. While the large-scale variability in net primary production (NPP) has been extensively studied, ocean gross primary production (GPP) has thus far received less attention. In this study, we derived two satellite-based GPP models by training machine learning algorithms (Random Forest) with light-dark bottle incubations (GPP(LD)) and the triple isotopes of dissolved oxygen (GPP(17 Delta)). The two algorithms predict global GPPs of 9.2 +/- 1.3 x 10(15) and 15.1 +/- 1.05 x 10(15) mol O-2 yr(-1) for GPP(LD) and GPP(17 Delta), respectively. The projected GPP distributions agree with our understanding of the mechanisms regulating primary production. Global GPP(17 Delta) was higher than GPP(LD) by an average factor of 1.6 which varied meridionally. The discrepancy between GPP(17 Delta) and GPP(LD) simulations can be partly explained by the known biases of each methodology. After accounting for some of these biases, the GPP(17 Delta) and GPP(LD) converge to 9.5 similar to 12.6 x 10(15) mol O-2 yr(-1), equivalent to 103 similar to 150 Pg C yr(-1). Our results suggest that global oceanic GPP is 1.5-2.2 fold larger than oceanic NPP and comparable to GPP on land.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据