4.6 Article

The polyphase rifting and inversion of the Danube Basin revised

期刊

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103375

关键词

Pannonian Basin System; Neogene geodynamic processes; Back-arc basin; Rifting phases; Basin inversion; Planation processes

资金

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV) [APVV-15-0575, APVV-16-0121, APVV-16-0146, APVV-16-0482, APVV-17-0170, APVV-19-0150]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [2/0006/19]
  3. Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA) [2/0006/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research re-evaluates the evolutionary history of the Danube Basin, including pre-rift, syn-rift, post-rift, and inversion stages. It shows that various factors such as tectonic processes, subsidence history, and biostratigraphic data have contributed to the formation of the basin.
To track the evolution and formation of one of the major sub-basins of the Pannonian back-arc basin system, we re-evaluate pre-rift, syn-rift, post-rift, and inversion stages of the Danube Basin. This synthesis builds upon a new compilation of (i) geophysical measurements, (ii) current data about the substratum of the basin, (iii) recent advances in stratigraphic architecture of the basin fill, (iv) subsidence history, (v) geomorphological evolution, and (vi) new biostratigraphic and geochronological data.The history of the basin begins with the pre-rift stage represented by the pre-Neogene basement, which belongs to an Eo-Alpine mountain range uplifted at the end of the Cretaceous. The core of the mountain range was formed by pre-Alpine high-grade metamorphic complexes, with a dome-like structure. The crystalline complexes were overlain by late Paleozoic and Mesozoic cover and nappes, which were later eroded during the early Cenozoic. These pre-rift processes were triggered by (i) the late Cenozoic collision of the Alpine-Carpathian orogenic wedge with the European platform, (ii) the crustal extension resulting from the northeastward lateral extrusion of the Alpine-Carpathian-Pannonian lithospheric microplate, and (iii) the subsequent updoming of the lithospheric mantle. This stage was followed by the polyphase rifting of the basin associated with extensive volcanic activity. This syn-rift stage consists of four phases. The first syn-rift phase dated to the early Badenian (similar to 15.2-13.8 Ma), with subsidence documented in the Blatne and Zeliezovce depressions, was characterized by accommodation rates up to similar to 900 m.Ma(-1). The second syn-rift phase dated to the late Badenian (similar to 13.8-12.6 Ma), exhibited accelerated subsidence with accommodation rates up to similar to 2300 m.Ma(-1), and mainly affected the Blatne depression. The third and fourth syn-rift phases took place during the Sarmatian (similar to 12.6-11.6 Ma) and early Pannonian (similar to 11.6-9.5 Ma) and the accommodation rates reached similar to 900 m.Ma(-1) and similar to 1000 m.Ma(-1), respectively. They were documented in the Risnovce, Komjatice and Gabcikovo-Gyor depressions, confirming the eastward subsidence migration, up to the external zone of the middle Miocene mantle upheaval. The late Miocene post-rift stage, commonly refered to as a thermal subsidence stage (similar to 9.5-6.0 Ma), was associated with formation of a widespread planation surface called the Mid-mountain level on the margins of the basin. The history of the Danube Basin terminates with the inversion stage which began after similar to 6.0 Ma and is still ongoing. It includes the continuous uplift of the basin margins and the subsidence of the central depocenters. The fluvial depositional systems did not behave steadily, because (i) lateral channel mobility and area of deposition increased progressively until similar to 4-3 Ma and caused onlaps on the base of the succession, followed by (ii) gradual confinement of the streams to the central part of the basin by uplifting basin margins, recorded by formation of river terrace staircases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据