4.6 Article

Dam and megafloods at the First Bend of the Yangtze River since the Last Glacial Maximum

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 373, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107491

关键词

Luminescence dating; Damming chain sediments; Megaflood; Yangtze River; First Bend

资金

  1. National Non-Profit Fundamental Research Grant of China [IGCEA 1713, 1818, 2008, 1720]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501061, 41772199]
  3. One Belt and One Road Program, CAS [XDA20070102]
  4. Spark Project of China Earthquake Administration [XH20037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed multiple instances of the Yangtze River being dammed in the First Bend area, leading to the formation of ancient lakes and outburst megafloods. These events may have been triggered by debris flows caused by glacial advances on Yulong Mountain.
The Yangtze River is the longest watercourse in China, where it flows through the most densely populated and richest regions. The upper course of the River (Jinsha River) has been recurrently blocked over the course of time. The dam-outburst flood process has exerted a significant impact on the river's drainage area. However, the frequency of such events along the course of the Yangtze River remains poorly investigated. In this study, damming chain sediments were identified in the First Bend area of the Yangtze River, and were dated using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and C-14 techniques. The obtained ages would suggest that the river was dammed by a debris flow during the -20-7 ka period, with a resulting paleolake covering an area of 40.79 km(2) and having a water volume of 0.63 km(3). Two outburst megafloods occurred at -18-20 and 6.0 ka, respectively. The river was re-dammed again during 1.5-0.4 ka, with a lake coverage of 28.20 km(2) and water volume of 0.28 km(3). The dammed lake may have been gradually breached after-0.4 ka. The damming events were caused by debris flows triggered by glacial advances on Yulong Mountain. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据