4.4 Article

Spinel chemistry and geochemistry of serpentinite of North Delhi fold belt, Rajasthan: Constraining the petrogenesis and geodynamics of northwestern Indian shield

期刊

GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 2111-2134

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gj.4047

关键词

north Delhi fold belt; serpentinite; spinel

资金

  1. Geological Survey Of India [DI/CHQ/MIB-RSAS/2016/043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the presence of scattered and deformed serpentinite bodies at the western margin of the north Delhi fold belt, Rajasthan, with the chemistry of anhedral spinel aiding in genetic reconstruction and indicating the presence of an ancient forearc environment.
The western margin of the north Delhi fold belt, Rajasthan is mostly covered by the thick alluvium-sand cover of the Thar Desert. However, a study on a cluster of scattered and deformed serpentinite bodies exposed in the small opencast quarries are presented here. Though alteration and absence of primary phases possess constraints over petrogenesis, but, the accessory, anhedral spinel chemistry aids in the genetic reconstruction. The unaltered core part of the spinel that is, the Al-chromite (avg. 45.2 wt% Cr2O3), followed by ferrit chromite (avg. 32.3 wt% Cr2O3) inner rim and magnetite towards the outer rim is the character of spinels present in the host, where the chemistry of the core part is used exclusively. This core part of spinel preserves the primary mantle signature and attests the forearc peridotite character and a similar subduction-related trait is followed by the whole-rock major oxide proxies. Cumulative petrological, whole-rock geochemistry, and mineral chemical signature unequivocally advocate towards a harzburgitic protolith, an arc peridotitic character, and presence of ancient forearc environment. The present communication is the first to describe the detailed characterization of serpentinite bodies with a possible linkage towards the presence of ancient oceanic slices in the north Delhi fold belt, Rajasthan, NW India.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据