4.5 Article

Experimentally Induced Volumetric Re-equilibration of Plagioclase-Hosted Melt Inclusions

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GC009357

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-1634206, OCE-1634211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of melt inclusions to infer magmatic processes relies on the assumption that the inclusions have remained constant in mass and volume since trapping. Studies on re-equilibration behavior of melt inclusions in different host phases reveal that the process can vary, with some experiencing irreversible changes during heating experiments. The response of melt inclusions to exposure to high temperatures and extended experimental runs can involve both ductile and brittle deformation in the host rock, leading to changes in volume and gas exsolution.
The application of melt inclusions (MI) to infer magmatic processes assumes the MI have remained as constant mass, constant volume systems since the time of trapping. Understanding the effects of both compositional and volumetric re-equilibration is key for the interpretation of MI data. Although the re-equilibration behavior MI in quartz and olivine has been studied in some detail, the process is less understood for other MI host phases such as plagioclase, a common phase in igneous rocks. A MI can re-equilibrate when it experiences pressure and temperature (PT) conditions that differ from formation PT conditions. During laboratory heating, irreversible MI expansion may occur. As a result, the internal pressure within the MI decreases, resulting in chemical and structural changes to the MI and host. We present results of heating experiments on plagioclase-hosted MI designed to induce volumetric re-equilibration. The experiments consisted of incrementally heating the MI to temperatures above the homogenization temperatures. At similar to 40 degrees C above, the temperature at which the daughter minerals melted, irreversible volume expansion lowered the pressure in the MI, and led to exsolution of CO2 into vapor bubbles. With each additional few degrees of heating, additional episodes of CO2 exsolution, bubble nucleation and expansion of the vapor bubbles occurred. Re-equilibration of MI in plagioclase occurred through a combination of ductile and brittle deformation of the host surrounding the MI, whereas previous studies have shown that MI in olivine re-equilibrate dominantly through ductile deformation associated with movement along dislocations. This behavior is consistent with the differing rheological properties of these phases. Plain Language Summary During magma ascent and eruption, melt inclusions (MI), representing small pockets of melt trapped during mineral growth, experience conditions that may alter their original volume and composition. To recover conditions representative of those at the time of MI formation, heating experiments are performed to reverse changes that occur after the MI formed. Compositional and volatile analyses of MI that have been so treated reveal important and otherwise unobtainable information on the magmas stored at depth. However, depending on the temperature, experimental run time and heating rate, the MI can be irreversibly modified, sometimes without leaving obvious structural damage. To examine how MI respond to exposure to high-temperature and long-duration experimental runs, we heated plagioclase-hosted MI to temperatures beyond the inferred trapping temperature. We found that when the internal pressure in the MI exceeds the confining pressure, the plagioclase host undergoes both ductile and brittle deformation, thus allowing the MI volume to increase, leading to a decrease in the internal pressure and exsolution of volatiles dissolved in the melt. If the temperature was raised in increments beyond similar to 1270 degrees C, each new increment of overheating resulted in additional fracturing of the host, pressure decrease, vapor exsolution, bubble nucleation, migration, and coalescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据