4.7 Article

High expression of bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1) is associated with a poor survival rate in human gastric cancer, a dataset approaches

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 1141-1154

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.11.012

关键词

BMP1; mRNA expression; Survival analysis; Pathways analysis; Prognostic biomarker; Gastric cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BMP1 activates TGF-β and BMP signaling pathways in gastric cancer, promoting cancer invasiveness. The study reveals higher transcriptional expression and clinicopathological characteristics of BMP1 in GC compared to normal tissues, alongside worsening survival rate. It also identifies mutations, TFs, miRNAs, gene ontology features, and signaling pathways involved in GC development.
Bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1) is a secreted metalloprotease of the astacin M12A family of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). BMP1 activates transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and BMP signaling pathways by proteolytic cleavage, which has dual roles in gastrointestinal tumor development and progression. TGF-beta promotes invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer (GC) by the help of BMP1, so upregulation of the BMP1 may increase cancer invasiveness in GC. In this study,the transcriptional expression, mutations, survival rate, TFs, miRNAs, gene ontology, and signaling pathways of BMP1 were analyzed by using different web servers. We found higher transcriptional and clinicopathological characteristics expression compared to normal tissues, worsening survival rate in GC. We detected 25 missenses, 15 truncating mutations, 23 TFs, and 8 miRNAs. Finally, we identified and analyzed the co-expressed genes and found that the leukemia inhibitory factor is the most positively correlated gene. The gene ontological features and signaling pathways involved in GC development were evaluated as well. We believe that this study will provide a basis for BMP1 to be a significant biomarker for human GC prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据