4.6 Article

A retrospective study on the efficacy of prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at risk of mitochondrial DNA disorders

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 720-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01043-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  2. French Agence de la Biomedecine (ABM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively reviewed 20 years of prenatal diagnosis of pathogenic mtDNA variants in 80 pregnant women and 120 fetuses. The results showed that patients with undetectable pathogenic variants consistently had fetuses free of variants, while heteroplasmic women were very likely to transmit their variant.
Purpose Prenatal diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorders is challenging due to potential instability of fetal mutant loads and paucity of data connecting prenatal mutant loads to postnatal observations. Retrospective study of our prenatal cohort aims to examine the efficacy of prenatal diagnosis to improve counseling and reproductive options for those with pregnancies at risk of mtDNA disorders. Methods We report on a retrospective review of 20 years of prenatal diagnosis of pathogenic mtDNA variants in 80 pregnant women and 120 fetuses. Results Patients with undetectable pathogenic variants (n = 29) consistently had fetuses free of variants, while heteroplasmic women (n = 51) were very likely to transmit their variant (57/78 fetuses, 73%). In the latter case, 26 pregnancies were terminated because fetal mutant loads were >40%. Of the 84 children born, 27 were heteroplasmic (mutant load <65%). To date, no medical problems related to mitochondrial dysfunction have been reported. Conclusion Placental heterogeneity of mutant loads questioned the reliability of chorionic villous testing. Fetal mutant load stability, however, suggests the reliability of a single analysis of amniotic fluid at any stage of pregnancy for prenatal diagnosis of mtDNA disorders. Mutant loads under 40% reliably predict lack of symptoms in the progeny of heteroplasmic women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据