4.6 Article

It seems like COVID-19 now is the only disease present on Earth: living with a rare or undiagnosed disease during the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 837-844

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01069-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the specific impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with rare and undiagnosed diseases (RUDs), revealing barriers to essential healthcare, exacerbated physical and mental health challenges, and reduced access to educational and therapeutic services. Urgent measures are needed to address these challenges during and after the pandemic.
PURPOSE: Patients with rare and undiagnosed diseases (RUDs) face significant health challenges, which may be exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of this study was to identify specific impacts of the pandemic on RUD patients, and targets for improving support and health-care access. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of RUD patients and their family members from 21 April to 8 June 2020, recruited from 76 Facebook groups for RUDs. Questions assessed patient characteristics and impacts of the pandemic on RUD diagnosis and management. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 413), including 274 RUD patients and 139 family members, were predominantly female and white, though income varied. Impacts of the pandemic included (1) barriers to accessing essential health care, (2) specific impacts of restrictive COVID-19 visitation policies on ability to advocate in health-care settings, (3) uncertainty and fear regarding COVID-19 risk, (4) exacerbated physical and mental health challenges, (5) magnified impacts of reduced educational and therapeutic services, and (6) unexpected positive changes due to the pandemic. CONCLUSION: There are specific, serious challenges affecting RUD patients and families during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is an urgent need to develop approaches to mitigate these challenges both during and beyond the pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据