4.3 Article

Salinomyces polonicus: A moderately halophilic kin of the most extremely halotolerant fungus Hortaea werneckii

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 459-468

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2021.01.003

关键词

Black yeast; Dothideomycetes; Halophilic fungi; Taxonomy; Teratosphaeriaceae; Tinea nigra

类别

资金

  1. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified two moderately halophilic black yeast strains isolated from brine of a graduation tower in Poland as a new genus and species named Salinomyces polonicus, and proposed a new combination named Salinomyces thailandicus. Molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed a closer relationship between Hortaea thailandica and S. polonicus than with H. werneckii.
A clade where the most halotolerant fungus in the world -Hortaea werneckii, belongs (hereafter referred to as Hortaea werneckii lineage) includes five species: Hortaea werneckii, H. thailandica, Stenella araguata, Eupenidiella venezuelensis, and Magnuscella marina, of which the first species attracts increasing attention of mycologists. The species diversity and phylogenetic relationships within this lineage are weakly known. In this study two moderately halophilic black yeast strains were isolated from brine of graduation tower in Poland. Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (=ITS), rDNA 28S D1-D2 (=LSU), and RNA polymerase II (rpb2) sequences showed that the two strains belong to Hortaea werneckii lineage but cannot be assigned to any described taxa. Accordingly, a new genus and species, Salinomyces and Salinomyces polonicus, are described for this fungus. Furthermore, molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hortaea thailandica is more closely related to S. polonicus than to H. werneckii. A new combination Salinomyces thailandicus is proposed for this fungus. (c) 2021 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据