4.5 Article

Features of digitally captured signatures vs. pen and paper signatures: Similar or completely different?

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
卷 318, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110587

关键词

Digitally captured signatures; Pen and paper signatures; Forensic handwriting examination; Signature pads; Technical artefacts

资金

  1. European Union's Internal Security Fund -Police

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the differences between digitally captured signatures and conventional pen and paper signatures, finding minor discrepancies in character shape and pen lifts between the two types of signatures. However, these differences were deemed to have no significant impact on the practical comparability by forensic handwriting examiners. Statistical analysis also showed significant differences between the three signature types, but with minor effect sizes.
The question of whether digitally captured signatures and conventional signatures executed with a pen on paper differ in their characteristics is of practical relevance for forensic handwriting examiners. Due to gaps in the current literature, the present research is dedicated to this issue. Eighty persons signed in three conditions: a) with a stylus on a pad, b) with an inking pen on a sticky note attached to a signature pad allowing to obtain a digital and an analogue version on paper of one and the same writing simultaneously, and c) with a pen on paper. The first step was to investigate to what extent the character shape and number of pen lifts differ between the digital and analogue representation of one and the same signature. This revealed minor differences which are due to technical characteristics of the devices used. The observed distortions are of minor practical relevance according to ratings by eight participating forensic handwriting examiners. Subsequently, signature characteristics were compared between the three different writing conditions in a casework-oriented way. Statistical multi-level models indicate significant differences between the three signature types, but minor effect sizes in most of the examined characteristics. From the point of view of the participating handwriting examiners, these factors do not fundamentally restrict the comparability between digitally captured and conventional signatures in practice. However, caution should be exercised when generalising the results, as several factors, such as the usage of different signature pads as well as signatures made with the finger instead of a stylus, could result in more important differences compared to pen and paper signatures. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据