4.7 Review

Research advances and application of pulsed electric field on proteins and peptides in food

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109914

关键词

Pulsed electric field; Food protein; Enzyme activity; Bioactive peptides

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PEF processing shows great potential in extracting proteins, inactivating endogenous enzymes, and improving peptides' biological activities, but there is still a lack of understanding regarding its effects on proteins and peptides.
Proteins or peptides are essential nutrients required by the human body because some essential amino acids cannot be biosynthesized. In this context, food industry is urged to find method to meet the demands of high protein yield and high bioactive protein/peptide production. Pulsed electric fields (PEF) possess high potential and a promising future in the processing and activity performance enhancement of protein/peptides. PEF processing, as food preservation technology, has ongoing from laboratory and pilot plant scale level to the industrial level, however, there was a lack of knowledge on the effects of PEF on proteins and peptides. In the last few years, the increasing number of studies demonstrated that PEF processing is effective in extracting protein, inactivating most endogenous enzymes in foods, improving peptides' biological activities. We provide an overview of existing and potential applications of PEF on proteins and peptides in food and suggest that the change in structures and functions of proteins/ protein hydrolysates (food component proteins/peptides and enzymes) in PEF processing is receiving considerable attention and may provide a basis for elucidating influence mechanism of PEF processing on protein/peptides and for further improving its application accuracy and range, which thereby could become a key technology for protein-based foods in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据