4.6 Article

Eliciting willingness to pay for fairtrade products with information

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104066

关键词

Fairtrade; Ethical certifications; Experimental auction; Information

资金

  1. Fairtrade Italia
  2. COOP Lombardia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since its establishment, Fairtrade certification has become mainstream in developed countries, with consumers willing to pay a premium for certified products, especially when provided with additional information. This study found that consumers value the certification and are more likely to pay a higher price when given more information about the Fairtrade system.
Since its foundation, Fairtrade certification has successfully entered the mainstream market in most developed countries, and certified products can be found on the shelves of the most famous retailers. However, using labels to inform consumers about the ethical sustainability of products does not imply that they will read or use them at the time of purchase, and providing additional information has been identified as a viable method to increase the pool of buyers of certified products. Using Becker-Degroot-Marschak experimental auction and white refined cane sugar packs, we elicit the homegrown value that consumers in Milan (Italy) associate with Fairtrade certification, and we investigate the effect of providing additional information about Fairtrade on their willingness to pay. Our results show that consumers positively evaluate the presence of the certification on the products as they are willing to pay a premium for the certified products, and the premium increases when consumers are exposed to additional information regarding the Fairtrade system. Furthermore, combining the results of the auction with data collected through questionnaires, we analyze consumers' profiles concerning their attitude towards Fairtrade certification and response to information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据