4.7 Article

Cleaner and faster method to detect adulteration in cassava starch using Raman spectroscopy and one-class support vector machine

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107917

关键词

Tapioca; Food adulteration; One-class modelling; Support vector machine; Machine learning; Chemometrics

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Bioanalitica - INCTBio [FAPESP] [2014/508673]
  2. CNPq [465389/2014]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [303994/2017-7]
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a new method for detecting adulterants in cassava starch using Raman spectroscopy, with the use of one-class models for data treatment showing promising results. Comparisons between OC-SVM and SIMCA were conducted, with OC-SVM outperforming SIMCA in predicting known data samples and detecting adulterations over 2%.
Due to food adulteration concerns, analytical assays are routinely performed in labs to evaluate and ensure food quality control. However, classical analytical methods used to acquire reliable results are lengthy and costly. Therefore, we aim to propose a new approach to detect adulterants in cassava starch in a clean, green, cheap, and quick way. Raman spectroscopy meets all these requirements and presents great potential to perform such routine analyses. Data treatment is also an important step in authentication problems, and we propose the use of one-class models to do so. One-class support vector machine (OC-SVM) and soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA) were the two approaches to one-class classifiers assessed in this study. Cassava starch samples were modified in the lab with adulteration ranging from 0.5 to 50%, with adulterants such as wheat flour, sodium bicarbonate, and others. The two chemometric models were statistically compared and OC-SVM was found to outperform SIMCA, reaching higher values of sensitivity (87.1%), specificity (86.8%), and accuracy (86.9%) in the prediction of known data samples. This better performance also resulted in the possibility of detecting adulterations over 2% by OC-SVM, compared to only 5% by SIMCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据