4.7 Article

Magnetic boron nitride nanosheets as a novel magnetic solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the determination of plant growth regulators in tomatoes

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 348, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129103

关键词

Magnetic boron nitride nanosheets; Magnetic solid-phase extraction; Plant growth regulators; HPLC-MS/MS; Tomato

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21804080, 21777089, 21703125]
  2. Youth Science Funds of Shandong Academy of Science [2020QN002]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2017GSF17107, 2019GSF111015, 2019GSF111001]
  4. Shandong Province Taishan Scholar Program [ts201712063, ts20190948]
  5. Innovation Project of Science Education Industry [013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel magnetic solid-phase extraction method using Fe3O4@BNNSs composite was developed for the analysis of plant growth regulators (PGRs) in tomatoes with HPLC-MS/MS. The optimized method showed excellent detection performance and successfully extracted and determined PGRs in tomatoes.
A novel magnetic boron nitride nanosheets (Fe3O4@BNNSs) composite-based magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) method was employed to analyse six plant growth regulators (PGRs) in tomatoes combined with highperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The novel Fe3O4@BNNSs composite was prepared via an in situ chemical coprecipitation process and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Xray diffraction (XRD), and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). Several factors that may affect the extraction efficiencies were optimized. Under the optimal factors, low limits of detection (0.002-0.010 ng g(-1)), good linear ranges (0.05-10 ng g(-1)) and satisfactory precisions (intra-day: 1.2%-3.9%; inter-day: 2.1%-6.9%) were achieved. The established approach was successfully employed to extract and determine PGRs in tomatoes, and the spiked recoveries were between 85.2 and 109.0%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据