4.3 Article

mTOR Kinase is Needed for the Development and Stabilization of Dendritic Arbors in Newly Born Olfactory Bulb Neurons

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 12, 页码 1308-1327

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22392

关键词

postnatal neurogenesis; mTOR; dendritogenesis; olfactory bulb; in vivo electroporation

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development [ERA-NET-NEURON/03/2010]
  2. National Science Centre [2013/08/T/NZ3/01013, 2011/03/B/NZ3/01970, 2013/11/D/NZ3/01079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurogenesis is the process of neuron generation, which occurs not only during embryonic development but also in restricted niches postnatally. One such region is called the subventricular zone (SVZ), which gives rise to new neurons in the olfactory bulb (OB). Neurons that are born postnatally migrate through more complex territories and integrate into fully functional circuits. Therefore, differences in the differentiation of embryonic and postnatally born neurons may exist. Dendritogenesis is an important process for the proper formation of future neuronal circuits. Dendritogenesis in embryonic neurons cultured in vitro was shown to depend on the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Still unknown, however, is whether mTOR could regulate the dendritic arbor morphology of SVZ-derived postnatal OB neurons under physiological conditions in vivo. The present study used in vitro cultured and differentiated SVZ-derived neural progenitors and found that both mTOR complex 1 and mTOR complex 2 were required for the dendritogenesis of SVZ-derived neurons. Furthermore, using a combination of in vivo electroporation of neural stem cells in the SVZ and genetic and pharmacological inhibition of mTOR, it was found that mTOR was crucial for the growth of basal and apical dendrites in postnatally born OB neurons under physiological conditions and contributed to the stabilization of their basal dendrites. (C) 2016 The Authors Developmental Neurobiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据