4.7 Article

Isolation, purification, gene cloning and expression of antifungal protein from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MG-3

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129130

关键词

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Antifungal protein; Isolation; Purification; Heterologous expression; Recombinant antifungal protein

资金

  1. Program of Finance Department of Fujian Province in China [2014-1262, 2015-1297, 2018-983]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Foundation at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University of China [CXZX2016086, KF2015051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antifungal protein MG-3A was isolated, purified, and identified, showing broad antifungal spectrum and good stabilities to temperature, pH and protease K. The serine protease gene MG-3A was cloned and expressed in vitro, with highly soluble recombinant protein. Affinity chromatography was used to purify the recombinant protein and evaluate its antifungal activity.
The antifungal protein MG-3A was isolated from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MG-3, and was purified and identified. The results showed that antifungal protein MG-3A was likely a serine protease with a molecular weight of similar to 48 kDa. The serine protease exhibited a broad antifungal spectrum and effectively extended the shelf-life of loquat fruit up to 25 d. The antifungal protein MG-3A showed good stabilities to temperature, pH and protease K. Primers were designed according to the mass spectrum of antifungal protein and the comparison with proteins in the NCBI database. The serine protease gene MG-3A from B. amyloliquefaciens genome was isolated and cloned using PCR. The prokaryotic expression plasmid pET28a-MG-3A was constructed and used to express the antimicrobial protein in vitro. The SDS-PAGE results showed that the recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) was highly soluble. Affinity chromatography was used to purify the recombinant protein and its antifungal activity was evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据